Soccer Any 13 Xtra Results and Payouts – Saturday 10 October 2026 – S13X V3 P1 (Z13)

The Soccer Any 13 Xtra pool for Saturday 10 October 2026 has been officially settled, with results recorded across 30 listed fixtures. The card featured major European league matches, South African football and several closely contested encounters, creating a mix of convincing victories, narrow wins and draws. Manchester City’s away victory at Liverpool, Brighton’s win at Sunderland and Real Betis’ seven-goal match against Osasuna were among the results that shaped the final outcome.

Pool: Soccer Any 13 Xtra
Date: Saturday 10 October 2026
Pool Code: S13X V3 P1 (Z13)
Status: Official
Matches Listed: 30
Winning Combination: All/1/2/1/1/3/3/3/1/2/1/1/2/1/2/1/2/1/3/1/1/1/1/3/2/1/3/2/3/2

 

Overall Match Results – Soccer Any 13 Xtra – 10 October 2026 – S13X V3 P1

 

⚽ Match Results Analysis – Soccer Any 13 Xtra – S13X V3 P1

• Match 1: Rayo Vallecano vs Athletic Bilbao (Field-Field). This fixture was settled as Field-Field rather than through a conventional match score. Its winning-combination entry is therefore recorded as All, meaning it did not require players to identify a specific home, draw or away outcome. The result removed one match-specific prediction obstacle from the pool.
• Match 2: Genoa 2-1 Fiorentina. Genoa secured a narrow home victory against Fiorentina, with the single-goal margin reflecting a competitive contest. The hosts found enough attacking output to claim all three points, while Fiorentina’s goal kept the match within reach. The outcome rewarded selections backing Genoa’s home advantage.
• Match 3: Aston Villa 2-2 Brentford. Brentford earned a valuable away draw in a four-goal encounter. Aston Villa scored twice at home but could not convert that attacking production into victory, making defensive resistance a decisive factor. The draw was an important result for players who avoided treating Villa as a guaranteed home winner.
• Match 4: Chelsea 5-1 Bournemouth. Chelsea produced one of the strongest attacking performances on the card, scoring five times and winning by four goals. Bournemouth managed a consolation goal but could not contain the hosts’ attacking threat. This was a decisive home result, with considerably less scoreline uncertainty than many of the pool’s narrow fixtures.
• Match 5: Ipswich Town 2-1 Fulham. Ipswich Town claimed a significant home victory despite conceding once. The hosts’ ability to score twice proved sufficient, while Fulham failed to turn their attacking contribution into an away result. This was a potentially difficult selection for players who had preferred Fulham on the strength of the teams’ relative reputations.
• Match 6: Sunderland 0-2 Brighton-HA. Brighton delivered a convincing away result by scoring twice without conceding. Sunderland’s failure to find the net meant the visitors controlled the outcome on the scoreboard, turning a potentially competitive fixture into a clear away selection. Brighton’s clean sheet was as important as their two-goal attacking return.
• Match 7: Deportivo Alaves 1-2 Atletico Madrid. Atletico Madrid secured a narrow away victory against Alaves. The visitors scored enough to overcome the hosts’ resistance, although conceding once prevented a comfortable margin. The result demonstrated why Atletico could not be dismissed away from home, even in a fixture where the home side remained competitive.
• Match 8: Orlando Pirates 0-2 Mamelodi Sundowns. Mamelodi Sundowns recorded an important two-goal away victory without conceding against Orlando Pirates. Winning by this margin in a prominent South African matchup made the away result particularly significant. Pirates’ inability to score left no room for a draw, rewarding players who supported Sundowns despite the demanding opposition.
• Match 9: Barcelona 3-0 Getafe. Barcelona combined three goals with a clean sheet to produce a convincing home win. Getafe failed to register a scoring response, while Barcelona established a clear margin of superiority. The result was one of the more straightforward home outcomes on a card containing several closely matched fixtures.
• Match 10: Manchester United 1-1 Tottenham Hotspur. Manchester United and Tottenham shared the points after both sides scored once. Neither team managed to turn its goal into a decisive advantage, making the draw the correct selection in a high-profile Premier League encounter. This was an important reminder of the risk attached to choosing a single winner when the opposition is capable of responding.
• Match 11: Napoli 3-0 Frosinone. Napoli delivered a commanding home result, scoring three unanswered goals. Frosinone’s lack of a scoring response meant the visitors never altered the final balance of the match. Napoli’s combination of attacking efficiency and a clean sheet made this a clear home-win outcome.
• Match 12: Real Madrid 1-0 Villarreal. Real Madrid secured all three points through a single-goal victory. Unlike the more comfortable home wins elsewhere on the card, this result depended on preventing Villarreal from finding an equaliser. The narrow margin made the match less comfortable than a conventional strong-home-favourite selection might have suggested.
• Match 13: Como 0-0 Roma. Como held Roma to a goalless draw, producing one of the pool’s most restrictive scorelines. Neither side converted an opportunity into a goal, so the home side successfully denied Roma an away victory. This was a notable draw result for players who expected the visitors to make their greater reputation count.
• Match 14: Southampton 1-0 Portsmouth. Southampton edged Portsmouth through a single goal while keeping their opponents scoreless. With no second goal to create a cushion, protecting the lead was crucial to the home victory. The result rewarded Southampton backers but offered little margin for error throughout the contest.
• Match 15: Elche 0-0 Celta de Vigo. Elche and Celta de Vigo finished without a goal, adding another goalless draw to the pool. Neither team established an attacking advantage on the scoreboard, and both sides collected a point. The result was especially relevant to players who had expected either home advantage or Celta’s attacking potential to produce a winner.
• Match 16: Crystal Palace 3-1 Nottingham Forest. Crystal Palace scored three times to secure a convincing home victory. Nottingham Forest found the net once but could not match the hosts’ attacking output. Palace’s two-goal winning margin made the home selection decisive, even though the visitors prevented a clean sheet.
• Match 17: Hull City 2-2 Everton. Hull City and Everton shared four goals in another drawn contest. Hull scored twice at home, yet Everton matched that total to avoid defeat. The result illustrated how a productive home attack does not necessarily guarantee victory when the away side is equally effective in front of goal.
• Match 18: Lazio 3-1 AC Monza. Lazio earned a comfortable home victory by scoring three goals against Monza. Although the visitors registered once, they could not keep the contest close enough to threaten the final outcome. Lazio’s two-goal margin distinguished this result from the numerous one-goal home wins elsewhere in the pool.
• Match 19: U.S Lecce 1-2 Bologna. Bologna collected all three points away from home after scoring twice against Lecce. The hosts managed one goal, but their attacking return was insufficient to avoid defeat. The result rewarded an away selection in a fixture where Lecce’s home advantage did not translate into points.
• Match 20: Nice 2-1 Strasbourg. Nice used their home advantage to secure a narrow victory over Strasbourg. Both teams scored, but Nice’s second goal established the decisive difference. The visitors remained competitive, making this a less secure home result than the final winning combination alone might suggest.
• Match 21: FC Koln 2-1 Borussia M’gladbach. FC Koln defeated Borussia Monchengladbach by one goal in a tightly scored encounter. The hosts’ two-goal return was enough to withstand the visitors’ reply. The outcome favoured the home side in a matchup where backing either team without considering the draw carried additional risk.
• Match 22: Real Sociedad 3-2 Deportivo La Coruna. Real Sociedad emerged victorious from a five-goal contest. Deportivo La Coruna scored twice away from home, keeping pressure on the hosts, but Sociedad’s third goal made the difference. The result highlighted substantial scoring activity from both sides, even though the winning selection remained a home victory.
• Match 23: Rio Ave 3-2 C.D Nacional. Rio Ave secured another dramatic 3-2 home win on the card. Nacional’s two away goals prevented the result from becoming comfortable, but the hosts ultimately produced the stronger attacking return. This was a demanding home selection because the narrow margin left little protection against an equaliser.
• Match 24: Liverpool 0-3 Manchester City. Manchester City recorded one of the day’s standout results with a three-goal victory at Liverpool. The visitors combined a convincing attacking return with a clean sheet, while Liverpool failed to score at home. The size of the away victory made this a particularly influential result for players who had relied heavily on Liverpool’s home advantage.
• Match 25: Sassuolo 1-1 AC Milan. Sassuolo held AC Milan to a draw after both teams scored once. Milan failed to turn their away attacking contribution into a winning margin, while Sassuolo secured a point against prominent opposition. This result punished selections that treated Milan’s status as sufficient justification for an automatic away win.
• Match 26: Real Betis 5-2 Osasuna. Real Betis produced the highest-scoring fixture of the pool, winning 5-2 against Osasuna. The hosts’ five goals established a decisive advantage despite conceding twice. With seven goals in total, the match stood out for attacking output and supplied one of the clearest home victories on the card.
• Match 27: Zamalek 0-2 Al Ahly SC. Al Ahly claimed a significant away victory over Zamalek, scoring twice without conceding. In a major Egyptian football rivalry, the clean sheet gave the visitors a decisive advantage. The result favoured players who backed Al Ahly away from home rather than relying on the hosts to use familiar surroundings.
• Match 28: Cagliari 1-1 Juventus. Cagliari earned a home draw against Juventus, with each side scoring once. Juventus could not convert their goal into an away victory, and Cagliari’s response ensured the points were shared. The draw became another important obstacle for players relying on better-known clubs to win away fixtures.
• Match 29: ESTAC Troyes 0-2 Marseille. Marseille secured a controlled two-goal away result against Troyes. The visitors’ clean sheet prevented the hosts from applying scoreboard pressure, while two goals were enough to establish a comfortable margin. This was a clear away-winning outcome compared with the more finely balanced fixtures elsewhere in the pool.
• Match 30: Racing Santander 2-2 Valencia. Racing Santander and Valencia closed the card with a four-goal draw. Both teams scored twice, but neither established the decisive advantage needed for victory. Valencia’s ability to score away from home was matched by Santander’s attacking return, making the draw the final correct selection.

 

Soccer Any 13 Xtra Results Summary

• Total Matches Listed: 30
• Matches With Recorded Scores: 29
• Field-Field Results: 1
• Home Wins: 14
• Draws: 8
• Away Wins: 7
• Total Goals: 86
• Highest-Scoring Match: Real Betis 5-2 Osasuna (7 goals)
• Biggest Home Victory: Chelsea 5-1 Bournemouth
• Standout Away Victory: Liverpool 0-3 Manchester City
• Notable Draws: Aston Villa 2-2 Brentford, Manchester United 1-1 Tottenham, Sassuolo 1-1 AC Milan and Cagliari 1-1 Juventus
• Winning Combination: All/1/2/1/1/3/3/3/1/2/1/1/2/1/2/1/2/1/3/1/1/1/1/3/2/1/3/2/3/2
• Status: Official

 

Soccer Any 13 Xtra Payouts – S13X V3 P1 (Z13)

 

Soccer Any 13 Xtra Winning Dividends Analysis

• 13/13 Division: A total of 275 winning entries received R1,253.60 each. The top division had a net allocation of R344,776.96, making it substantially more valuable per winning entry than the 12/13 category.
• 12/13 Division: There were 2,951 winning entries in this category, with a dividend of R28.20. The comparatively modest payout reflected the much larger number of successful entries sharing the division’s R83,475.84 net allocation.
• Combined Net Prize Allocation: The two published divisions accounted for R428,252.80 in net prize allocations.
• Combined Winning Entries: The official payout figures recorded 3,226 winning entries across the 12/13 and 13/13 divisions.
• Impact of the Field-Field Result: Match 1 was recorded as All in the winning combination. This removed the need to predict a specific outcome for that fixture, reducing one source of difficulty for affected selections.
• Impact of Draws: Eight of the 29 matches with recorded scores finished level. Draws involving Aston Villa, Manchester United, Roma, AC Milan and Juventus were particularly relevant because selections favouring those clubs to win would not have matched the official outcomes.
• Impact of Away Victories: Manchester City’s 3-0 win at Liverpool, Al Ahly’s victory at Zamalek and Brighton’s success at Sunderland demonstrated the danger of relying on home advantage alone. These results could disrupt combinations built around home favourites.
• Distribution of Results: Home wins accounted for 14 of the 29 scored fixtures, compared with eight draws and seven away wins. Although home victories were the largest individual outcome category, more than half of the scored matches finished without a home win.

 

The Soccer Any 13 Xtra pool for 10 October 2026 combined 14 home victories, eight draws and seven away wins, alongside one Field-Field result. Chelsea, Barcelona, Napoli and Real Betis supplied convincing home results, while Manchester City’s emphatic victory at Liverpool and Al Ahly’s win over Zamalek stood out among the away successes. Draws involving Aston Villa, Manchester United, Roma, AC Milan and Juventus created additional difficulty for selections built around established favourites. The official payouts confirmed 275 winning entries in the 13/13 division at R1,253.60 each, while 2,951 entries collected R28.20 for 12/13.

 

Betting Types Explained

The 1X2 System – Classic Match Result

This is the standard bet used in soccer betting and all Soccer Pools. You choose the outcome after 90 minutes:

• 1 – Home team to win
• X – Draw
• 2 – Away team to win

Singles, Doubles & Triple Bets

Sometimes it’s safer to back more than one possible result in a single match.

Triple Chance Bets are only available in Soccer Pools-style games and lock that leg of your bet.

Double Chance Bets are widely used in normal sports betting and combo tickets.

Double Chance Betting

• 1X – Home win or Draw
• X2 – Draw or Away win
• 12 – Home win or Away win (no draw)

Triple Chance Betting

1X2 – Any result will land (home/draw/away)

Banker Bets & Codes

Bankers are selections with the strongest stats – picks with the highest chance of success.

Over / Under Goals – O/U Explained

Over Goals (O/):

• Over 0.5 – 1+ goal total
• Over 1.5 – 2 or more goals
• Over 2.5 – 3 or more goals
• Over 3.5 – 4 or more goals
• Over 4.5 – 5 or more goals

Under Goals (U/):

• Under 0.5 – goalless match (0-0)
• Under 1.5 – max 1 goal total
• Under 2.5 – max 2 goals
• Under 3.5 – max 3 goals
• Under 4.5 – max 4 goals

Both Teams To Score (BTTS)

• BTTS – Yes: both teams must score
• BTTS – No: one or both teams fail to score