Soccer 10 Results and Analysis – Fri 16 Oct – S10 V3 (1TT)

The Soccer 10 S10 V3 (1TT) pool delivered five away victories, three home wins and two draws across ten fixtures, producing a total of 31 goals. Visiting teams enjoyed a particularly strong round, with Nancy, Boulogne, Cordoba, Toulouse and Wolverhampton all securing victories away from home. Heerenveen recorded the largest winning margin by defeating SBV Excelsior 4-0, while Laval and Clermont Foot shared an entertaining 3-3 draw. Frosinone’s 4-2 victory against Sassuolo provided another six-goal encounter, and Toulouse registered a commanding 3-0 success over Le Mans. Eintracht Frankfurt edged FC Koln 1-0, and Deportivo La Coruna finished level with Levante at 1-1. The official 3/3/2/1/1/3/3/1/3/2 combination produced 88 perfect 10/10 entries, each receiving R15,276.20. A further 1,533 entries collected R194.00 in the 9/10 category.

Status: Official
Pool Code: S10 V3 (1TT)

 

Overall Match Results – Soccer 10 – Fri 16 Oct – S10 V3

 

⚽ Match Results Analysis – Soccer 10 – S10 V3

• Match 1: FC Annecy 1-2 Nancy. Nancy opened the ten-match coupon with a 2-1 away victory over FC Annecy, immediately establishing a successful 3 selection. Both teams found the net, but the visitors finished one goal ahead. Annecy’s goal kept the final margin narrow, although it was insufficient to prevent defeat. Nancy became the first of five away winners in a pool where visiting teams eventually accounted for half of all results. The three-goal encounter offered a relatively balanced scoreboard compared with the more decisive performances later recorded by Boulogne and Toulouse. Nancy also shared the same winning scoreline as Wolverhampton, who defeated Burnley 2-1 in M9. The opening result was especially relevant to the structure of the official combination because it began a sequence of two consecutive away victories before the first draw appeared.
• Match 2: Grenoble Foot 0-2 Boulogne. Boulogne maintained the early dominance of visiting teams with a convincing 2-0 victory against Grenoble Foot. The hosts failed to score, allowing Boulogne to secure the result with a two-goal advantage and a clean sheet. This was a more comfortable winning margin than Nancy’s opening 2-1 success, although both fixtures required selection 3. Grenoble’s inability to find the net meant the visitors did not need an especially large attacking return to finish clearly ahead. Boulogne became one of several teams to win without conceding, joining Heerenveen, Eintracht Frankfurt, Cordoba and Toulouse. The first two matches therefore produced a strong away-winning start, with Nancy and Boulogne combining for four goals while conceding only once. This sequence was interrupted in M3 when Laval and Clermont Foot produced a high-scoring draw.
• Match 3: Laval 3-3 Clermont Foot. Laval and Clermont Foot produced one of the most remarkable scorelines on the coupon, sharing six goals in a 3-3 draw. Both teams registered three goals, a total that would have been sufficient to win most of the other fixtures in this pool. However, neither side could establish a decisive advantage. The successful 2 represented the first draw and interrupted the opening sequence of away victories. Clermont Foot’s three goals were particularly notable because the visiting side scored more than Nancy, Boulogne, Cordoba or Wolverhampton, yet finished without an outright victory. Laval also achieved the second-highest individual scoring total among home teams, behind the four goals recorded by Heerenveen and Frosinone. This match contributed six of the round’s 31 goals and shared the highest overall scoring total with Frosinone against Sassuolo. The result demonstrated that substantial attacking production could still produce a draw when both teams matched each other on the scoreboard.
• Match 4: Heerenveen 4-0 SBV Excelsior. Heerenveen recorded the largest winning margin of the entire Soccer 10 pool, defeating SBV Excelsior 4-0. Four unanswered goals established a decisive home victory and provided the first successful 1 following two away wins and a draw. Excelsior failed to score, leaving Heerenveen with a clean sheet and an advantage that no other winner matched. Although Frosinone later equalled the four-goal attacking total, its 4-2 victory produced a smaller margin because Sassuolo scored twice. Heerenveen’s result was also more emphatic than Toulouse’s 3-0 away success at Le Mans. The four-goal difference made this the clearest winning performance of the ten fixtures. Following Laval’s six-goal draw, the match added another four goals and contributed to a particularly productive middle section of the coupon. Heerenveen’s home victory also began a pair of consecutive successful home selections.
• Match 5: Eintracht Frankfurt 1-0 FC Koln. Eintracht Frankfurt defeated FC Koln 1-0, extending the home-winning sequence established by Heerenveen in the previous fixture. The contrast between the two victories was substantial. Heerenveen scored four unanswered goals, whereas Frankfurt required only one to secure the same successful 1 selection. Koln failed to find the net, making Frankfurt’s clean sheet decisive to the narrow final margin. This was one of two matches on the coupon decided by a single goal with no response from the losing team, the other being Cordoba’s away success against Leganes. Frankfurt’s victory contributed just one goal to the overall total, but its significance in the winning combination was identical to that of the more prolific home results. The outcome completed the two consecutive home victories at M4 and M5 before the coupon returned to another sequence of away successes.
• Match 6: Leganes 0-1 Cordoba. Cordoba claimed a narrow away victory at Leganes, winning 1-0 in one of the lowest-scoring encounters of the round. The visitors needed only a single goal because Leganes finished without scoring. The successful 3 became the third away-winning selection and ended the short sequence of home victories recorded by Heerenveen and Eintracht Frankfurt. Cordoba’s performance was distinct from Boulogne’s 2-0 and Toulouse’s 3-0 successes, as both those visiting sides established larger final advantages. Nevertheless, Cordoba achieved the same outright away-winning outcome while maintaining a clean sheet. With only one goal scored, this fixture shared the minimum scoring total with Eintracht Frankfurt against FC Koln. The result also introduced another pair of consecutive away victories, as Toulouse followed with a comfortable win over Le Mans. In a coupon featuring several high-scoring matches, Cordoba’s efficient 1-0 success provided an important contrast.
• Match 7: Le Mans 0-3 Toulouse. Toulouse delivered the strongest away victory of the pool, defeating Le Mans 3-0. Three goals without reply gave the visitors the largest winning margin among the five successful away teams. Le Mans could not register a goal, allowing Toulouse to complete a convincing clean-sheet result. The successful 3 extended the second sequence of consecutive away selections, following Cordoba’s narrow victory at Leganes. These two matches illustrated the range of winning margins within the same outcome category: Cordoba needed only one goal, while Toulouse scored three and finished with a substantially greater advantage. Toulouse was also the only visiting winner to record three goals, exceeding the attacking returns of Nancy, Boulogne, Cordoba and Wolverhampton. The 3-0 result contributed another three goals to the coupon and represented one of the clearest victories of the round, surpassed in winning margin only by Heerenveen’s 4-0 home success.
• Match 8: Frosinone 4-2 Sassuolo. Frosinone defeated Sassuolo 4-2 in a six-goal encounter that matched Laval against Clermont Foot as the joint highest-scoring fixture of the pool. Unlike the 3-3 draw in M3, this match produced an outright winner, with Frosinone establishing a two-goal advantage. Sassuolo scored twice, more than any other losing team on the coupon, but still conceded four. Frosinone’s attacking total equalled Heerenveen’s four goals against Excelsior, although the final winning margins differed because Frosinone conceded twice. The successful 1 became the third and final home-winning selection of the round. This fixture also interrupted the consecutive away successes by Cordoba and Toulouse. Together, the two six-goal encounters accounted for 12 of the coupon’s 31 goals, underlining how strongly a small number of high-scoring matches influenced the overall scoring total.
• Match 9: Burnley 1-2 Wolverhampton. Wolverhampton secured a 2-1 away win over Burnley, providing the fifth and final visiting victory in the Soccer 10 pool. The hosts scored once, but Wolverhampton’s two-goal total was sufficient to establish a narrow winning advantage. This scoreline matched Nancy’s opening victory against FC Annecy, making the two fixtures identical in their final scoring distribution and successful 3 selection. Unlike Boulogne, Cordoba and Toulouse, Wolverhampton conceded a goal during its away success. The victory also ended any possibility of home wins matching away wins in the final result distribution, since five visiting teams had already won and only one fixture remained. Burnley’s single goal kept the difference to a minimum without altering the result. Wolverhampton’s success became especially important for entries that had correctly anticipated the more emphatic victories and the earlier high-scoring draw.
• Match 10: Deportivo La Coruna 1-1 Levante. Deportivo La Coruna and Levante completed the coupon with a 1-1 draw, producing the second successful 2 selection. Both teams found the net once, but neither established the additional goal required for an outright victory. This result differed significantly from the first draw between Laval and Clermont Foot, which contained six goals rather than two. Deportivo’s inability to secure a home win and Levante’s failure to finish ahead left the match level, completing a combination dominated by away victories. The final draw also ensured that the result distribution remained at five away wins, three home successes and two draws. For entries with nine correct selections from the preceding fixtures, correctly identifying the level outcome at M10 completed the official 3/3/2/1/1/3/3/1/3/2 combination. The match therefore provided the final result required for a perfect 10/10 entry.

 

Soccer 10 Results Summary

• Home Wins: 3
• Draws: 2
• Away Wins: 5
• Total Goals: 31
• Biggest Winning Margin: Heerenveen 4-0 SBV Excelsior
• Highest-Scoring Matches: Laval 3-3 Clermont Foot / Frosinone 4-2 Sassuolo (6 goals each)
• Lowest-Scoring Matches: Eintracht Frankfurt 1-0 FC Koln / Leganes 0-1 Cordoba
• Drawn Matches: Laval 3-3 Clermont Foot / Deportivo La Coruna 1-1 Levante
• Clean-Sheet Victories: Boulogne, Heerenveen, Eintracht Frankfurt, Cordoba and Toulouse
• Home Victories: Heerenveen, Eintracht Frankfurt and Frosinone
• Away Victories: Nancy, Boulogne, Cordoba, Toulouse and Wolverhampton
• Highest Individual Goal Totals: Heerenveen and Frosinone (4 goals each)
• Winning Combination: 3/3/2/1/1/3/3/1/3/2
• Status: Official

 

9/10 Results

Net Pool: R298,579.96
Winners: 1,533
Dividend: R194.00

 

10/10 Results

Net Pool: R1,344,319.84
Winners: 88
Dividend: R15,276.20

 

Soccer 10 Dividend Analysis

The official Soccer 10 S10 V3 results produced 88 perfect 10/10 entries, each receiving R15,276.20 from the R1,344,319.84 net pool. The separate 9/10 category recorded 1,533 winning entries, with a dividend of R194.00 from its R298,579.96 net pool. The difference between the two published dividends was substantial, with a perfect 10/10 return paying approximately 78.7 times the amount awarded for a 9/10 result.

The winning combination was heavily influenced by away victories. Nancy and Boulogne claimed the first two matches, Cordoba and Toulouse provided another consecutive pair at M6 and M7, and Wolverhampton secured the final away result at M9. These five successful visiting selections formed half of the coupon and distinguished it from a round dominated by home teams. The remaining positions required three home victories and two draws, creating a sequence that alternated between different outcome patterns rather than following a single uninterrupted trend.

Goals were distributed unevenly across the ten fixtures. Laval against Clermont Foot and Frosinone against Sassuolo each produced six goals, accounting for 12 of the 31 scored. Heerenveen added four unanswered goals against Excelsior, while Toulouse recorded a three-goal away victory at Le Mans. At the opposite end of the scoring range, Eintracht Frankfurt and Cordoba both achieved 1-0 victories. These results demonstrate that the same winning combination included dominant performances, narrow one-goal successes and two drawn encounters with very different scoring totals.

The two drawn fixtures also required careful selection. Laval and Clermont Foot finished 3-3 in M3, while Deportivo La Coruna and Levante drew 1-1 in the final match. Both produced the same successful 2 despite a four-goal difference in their combined scoring totals. The closing draw was the final required outcome for entries that had selected the preceding nine results correctly.

With 88 perfect entries compared with 1,533 entries in the 9/10 category, the official figures show a much smaller group achieving the complete ten-match combination. The R15,276.20 dividend rewarded those entries that correctly covered all five away victories, the three home results and both draws, while R194.00 was awarded in the separate 9/10 payout category.

 

The Soccer 10 S10 V3 (1TT) pool recorded five away wins, three home victories and two draws, with 31 goals across ten fixtures. Nancy defeated FC Annecy 2-1, Boulogne won 2-0 at Grenoble Foot, and Laval shared a 3-3 draw with Clermont Foot. Heerenveen secured the largest victory by beating SBV Excelsior 4-0, followed by Eintracht Frankfurt’s narrow 1-0 success against FC Koln. Cordoba defeated Leganes 1-0, Toulouse won 3-0 at Le Mans, and Frosinone overcame Sassuolo 4-2. Wolverhampton edged Burnley 2-1 before Deportivo La Coruna and Levante completed the coupon with a 1-1 draw. The official 3/3/2/1/1/3/3/1/3/2 combination produced 88 perfect 10/10 entries, each receiving R15,276.20. The 9/10 category recorded 1,533 winners with a dividend of R194.00.

 

Betting Types Explained

The 1X2 System – Classic Match Result

This is the standard bet used in soccer betting and all Soccer Pools. You choose the outcome after 90 minutes:

• 1 – Home team to win
• X – Draw
• 2 – Away team to win

Singles, Doubles & Triple Bets

Sometimes it’s safer to back more than one possible result in a single match.

Triple Chance Bets are only available in Soccer Pools-style games and lock that leg of your bet.

Double Chance Bets are widely used in normal sports betting and combo tickets.

Double Chance Betting

• 1X – Home win or Draw
• X2 – Draw or Away win
• 12 – Home win or Away win (no draw)

Triple Chance Betting

1X2 – Any result will land (home/draw/away)

Banker Bets & Codes

Bankers are selections with the strongest stats – picks with the highest chance of success.

Over / Under Goals – O/U Explained

Over Goals (O/):

• Over 0.5 – 1+ goal total
• Over 1.5 – 2 or more goals
• Over 2.5 – 3 or more goals
• Over 3.5 – 4 or more goals
• Over 4.5 – 5 or more goals

Under Goals (U/):

• Under 0.5 – goalless match (0-0)
• Under 1.5 – max 1 goal total
• Under 2.5 – max 2 goals
• Under 3.5 – max 3 goals
• Under 4.5 – max 4 goals

Both Teams To Score (BTTS)

• BTTS – Yes: both teams must score
• BTTS – No: one or both teams fail to score