Soccer 10 Results and Analysis – Mon 19 Oct – S10 V3 (SOO)

The Soccer 10 S10 V3 (SOO) pool produced five away victories, three home wins and two draws, with 22 goals scored across ten fixtures. AC Monza delivered the most emphatic performance by defeating Cagliari 4-0, while Trabzonspor secured a 2-0 home victory against Besiktas. FC Midtjylland, Kalmar FF, Roda JC and FC Steaua Bucuresti all recorded 2-1 away wins, and Dordrecht narrowly defeated Jong PSV II 1-0. Varbergs BoIS against Helsingborg and Beitar Jerusalem against Maccabi Tel Aviv both finished goalless. Jong Ajax II completed the group of home winners with a 2-1 victory over De Graafschap. The official 1/3/3/1/2/2/1/3/3/3 combination generated 15 perfect 10/10 entries, each receiving R33,600.00 from the R504,002.24 net top-prize pool. The 9/10 category recorded 279 winners, with a published dividend of R451.60.

Status: Official
Pool Code: S10 V3 (SOO)

 

Overall Match Results – Soccer 10 – Mon 19 Oct – S10 V3

 

⚽ Match Results Analysis – Soccer 10 – S10 V3

• Match 1: AC Monza 4-0 Cagliari. AC Monza opened the coupon with a commanding 4-0 home victory against Cagliari, establishing the first successful 1 selection. The hosts scored four times without conceding, producing both the largest winning margin and highest individual goal total of the round. Cagliari failed to score, leaving Monza with a clean sheet and an emphatic four-goal advantage. This fixture alone contributed approximately 18.2% of the pool’s 22 goals. Monza’s result was considerably more decisive than the remaining home victories, which Trabzonspor and Jong Ajax II secured by two and one goals respectively. It also contrasted with the subsequent away-winning fixtures, where visiting teams generally prevailed by narrow margins. Monza’s attacking return was greater than that of any other team on the coupon, making the opening result the clearest individual victory. Despite the comfortable margin, the successful home selection would be followed by two away results, demonstrating how quickly the winning combination changed direction.
• Match 2: Viborg FF 1-2 FC Midtjylland. FC Midtjylland defeated Viborg FF 2-1 away from home, providing the first successful 3 selection. The visitors scored twice, while Viborg managed one goal but could not secure a draw. The one-goal winning margin contrasted sharply with Monza’s four-goal advantage in the opening match. Midtjylland’s second goal proved decisive on the final scoreboard because Viborg successfully found the net once. This three-goal fixture contributed approximately 13.6% of the pool’s total scoring. The result also introduced a recurring pattern, as Kalmar, Roda JC and FC Steaua Bucuresti would later secure identical 2-1 away victories. Midtjylland’s success interrupted the opening home selection and began consecutive visiting wins. Unlike Monza, the Danish visitors did not keep a clean sheet, but they maintained a sufficient attacking advantage to secure the correct result category. The fixture established that several away wins would depend on narrow margins rather than overwhelming scoring superiority.
• Match 3: Degerfors IF 1-2 Kalmar FF. Kalmar FF recorded a 2-1 away victory against Degerfors IF, completing two consecutive successful visiting selections. The visitors scored twice and conceded once, exactly matching Midtjylland’s preceding result against Viborg. Degerfors managed one goal at home but remained a single goal behind on the final scoreboard. The successful 3 became the second away victory of the coupon and confirmed an early pattern of narrow successes for travelling teams. Both M2 and M3 contained three goals and were decided by one-goal margins, creating identical scoring profiles across consecutive fixtures. Kalmar’s victory contributed another three goals to the total of 22 and left home winners behind away teams after three matches. This result also demonstrated why predicting the winning side mattered more than identifying a high goal total: both hosts scored, but neither avoided defeat. After Kalmar’s success, the combination returned to a home-winning selection through Trabzonspor.
• Match 4: Trabzonspor 2-0 Besiktas. Trabzonspor defeated Besiktas 2-0, recording the second successful home selection of the round. The hosts scored twice while preventing the visitors from registering a goal, producing a clean-sheet victory and a comfortable two-goal margin. Besiktas joined Cagliari among the teams unable to score against a home winner. Unlike Monza’s emphatic four-goal success, Trabzonspor needed only two goals to establish a decisive result. The successful 1 interrupted consecutive away victories by Midtjylland and Kalmar and restored balance between home and away wins after four fixtures. This match contributed two goals to the overall total and was one of only three home-winning results across the coupon. Trabzonspor’s defensive achievement was especially important because their opponents’ inability to score allowed the hosts to maintain a clear advantage. The result also preceded consecutive goalless draws, meaning the opening four matches contained all of the pool’s home victories except Jong Ajax II’s later success.
• Match 5: Varbergs BoIS 0-0 Helsingborg. Varbergs BoIS and Helsingborg finished 0-0, producing the first successful 2 selection. Neither team scored, making this one of two fixtures with no goals. Both sides finished with clean sheets, but neither established an outright winning advantage. The result interrupted the sequence of four decisive matches that opened the coupon. It also contrasted with Monza’s four-goal victory and the three-goal encounters involving Midtjylland and Kalmar. This draw contributed nothing to the overall total of 22 goals. The successful level selection became particularly significant because another 0-0 result followed immediately at M6. As a result, successful entries needed to select two consecutive draws in the middle of an otherwise winner-dominated coupon. Varbergs and Helsingborg provided the first example of that rare sequence, reducing the overall proportion of outright victories without changing the balance between home and away wins.
• Match 6: Beitar Jerusalem 0-0 Maccabi Tel Aviv. Beitar Jerusalem and Maccabi Tel Aviv shared a goalless draw, repeating the exact scoreline recorded by Varbergs BoIS and Helsingborg. Neither side found the net, and both teams completed the fixture without conceding. The successful 2 created two consecutive draws at M5 and M6, the only drawn matches across the ten-fixture coupon. These two results made the middle section particularly distinctive because every other match produced an outright winner. The pair also contributed zero goals, creating a clear contrast with Monza’s opening four-goal victory. For perfect entries, identifying both goalless outcomes was essential to reproducing the official combination. After six fixtures, the pool contained two home victories, two away wins and two draws, creating an evenly balanced distribution of outcomes. The final four matches would then shift the coupon decisively towards visiting winners, beginning with Jong Ajax II’s home victory.
• Match 7: Jong Ajax II 2-1 De Graafschap. Jong Ajax II defeated De Graafschap 2-1, becoming the third and final home winner of the round. The hosts scored twice and conceded once, finishing with a narrow one-goal advantage. This result restored an outright winning outcome after consecutive 0-0 draws at M5 and M6. The fixture contributed three goals to the pool’s total, ending a two-match period without any scoring. Unlike Monza and Trabzonspor, Ajax did not maintain a clean sheet, so their second goal was essential to securing the victory. The successful 1 became the last home selection in the combination and gave hosts a temporary advantage of three victories to two. However, all three remaining fixtures would end in away wins, reversing that balance. Jong Ajax’s success therefore marked the final interruption before an uninterrupted sequence of visiting victories closed the coupon. The match also reinforced the prevalence of one-goal margins outside Monza’s dominant opening performance.
• Match 8: Jong Utrecht II 1-2 Roda JC. Roda JC recorded a 2-1 away victory against Jong Utrecht II, beginning the final sequence of consecutive visiting successes. The visitors scored twice, while Utrecht managed one goal but could not equalise. This was the third match to finish 1-2, repeating the results achieved by Midtjylland and Kalmar. The successful 3 became the third away victory overall and restored an even distribution between home and visiting winners. Roda’s one-goal advantage demonstrated that the away-winning pattern remained closely contested rather than consistently decisive. The fixture added three goals to the final total and contrasted with the two goalless draws in the middle of the coupon. Roda’s result also reinforced the importance of correctly identifying visiting teams that could win despite conceding. With two fixtures remaining, the coupon had produced three home wins, three away victories and two draws, before Dordrecht and Steaua completed the visitors’ advantage.
• Match 9: Jong PSV II 0-1 Dordrecht. Dordrecht secured a narrow 1-0 away victory against Jong PSV II, becoming the fourth visiting winner of the coupon. The visitors scored the only goal and maintained a clean sheet, while PSV failed to register a goal. This was the lowest-scoring decisive fixture, contributing only one of the 22 goals recorded across the pool. Unlike the previous 2-1 away victories, Dordrecht required just one goal because the hosts did not respond. The successful 3 extended the final away-winning sequence to two matches. It also moved visiting winners ahead of home teams for the first time since M3. Dordrecht’s clean sheet was significant because any PSV equaliser would have changed the final outcome into a draw. The result demonstrated that successful away selections could emerge from either a narrow attacking advantage with both teams scoring or a single decisive goal protected by a clean sheet.
• Match 10: FC Voluntari 1-2 FC Steaua Bucuresti. FC Steaua Bucuresti completed the coupon with a 2-1 away victory against FC Voluntari, providing the fifth successful 3 selection. The visitors scored twice, while Voluntari managed one goal but could not avoid defeat. This was the fourth match to finish 1-2, matching the earlier away victories by Midtjylland, Kalmar and Roda JC. Steaua’s second goal established the decisive advantage, making the match another one-goal success. The result completed three consecutive away victories at M8, M9 and M10, establishing the longest uninterrupted visiting sequence of the coupon. It also confirmed that away teams had won five of the ten fixtures, compared with three home successes and two draws. The final three-goal match raised the pool total to 22 and completed the official 1/3/3/1/2/2/1/3/3/3 combination. The closing sequence highlighted the importance of correctly identifying away winners in the final section after two consecutive draws had interrupted the earlier pattern.

 

Soccer 10 Results Summary

• Home Wins: 3
• Draws: 2
• Away Wins: 5
• Total Goals: 22
• Goals Scored by Home Teams: 12
• Goals Scored by Away Teams: 10
• Biggest Winning Margin: AC Monza 4-0 Cagliari (4 goals)
• Highest-Scoring Match: AC Monza 4-0 Cagliari (4 goals)
• Lowest-Scoring Matches: Varbergs BoIS 0-0 Helsingborg / Beitar Jerusalem 0-0 Maccabi Tel Aviv
• Lowest-Scoring Decisive Match: Jong PSV II 0-1 Dordrecht
• Clean-Sheet Victories: AC Monza, Trabzonspor and Dordrecht
• Home Victories: AC Monza, Trabzonspor and Jong Ajax II
• Away Victories: FC Midtjylland, Kalmar FF, Roda JC, Dordrecht and FC Steaua Bucuresti
• Drawn Matches: Varbergs BoIS 0-0 Helsingborg / Beitar Jerusalem 0-0 Maccabi Tel Aviv
• Most Frequent Winning Scoreline: 1-2 (4 matches)
• Three Consecutive Away Wins: M8, M9 and M10
• Winning Combination: 1/3/3/1/2/2/1/3/3/3
• Status: Official

 

Official Winning Combination – Soccer 10

1/3/3/1/2/2/1/3/3/3

The completed combination contained five away victories, three home wins and two draws. Visiting selections accounted for 50% of the results, home victories represented 30%, and the two draws made up the remaining 20%. The consecutive goalless matches at M5 and M6 and three straight away wins at M8-M10 were the most distinctive sequences.

 

Soccer 10 Prize Results

9/10 Results

Net Pool: R126,000.56
Winners: 279
Dividend: R451.60

 

10/10 Results

Net Pool: R504,002.24
Winners: 15
Dividend: R33,600.00

 

Soccer 10 Dividend Analysis

The official Soccer 10 S10 V3 (SOO) payout recorded 15 perfect entries in the 10/10 category, each receiving R33,600.00 from the R504,002.24 net top-prize pool. The 9/10 category recorded 279 winning entries, with a net pool of R126,000.56 and a published dividend of R451.60. The winning combination required five away victories, three home wins and two draws, making successful visiting selections the most frequent outcome.

The coupon’s structure was particularly demanding because both draws appeared consecutively in the middle. Varbergs BoIS and Helsingborg finished 0-0 at M5, followed immediately by another 0-0 result between Beitar Jerusalem and Maccabi Tel Aviv. The successful combination then shifted back to a home victory from Jong Ajax before closing with three consecutive away wins. Entries selecting only one of the consecutive draws would have been unable to complete a perfect result.

The ten fixtures produced 22 goals, averaging 2.2 per match. AC Monza contributed four goals through their 4-0 victory, while six fixtures finished with three goals each. Dordrecht’s narrow 1-0 success produced just one goal, and the two drawn matches contributed none. This scoring distribution was relatively moderate compared with pools containing several high-scoring fixtures.

Four of the five away victories were achieved through identical 2-1 scorelines. Midtjylland, Kalmar, Roda JC and FC Steaua Bucuresti all won after scoring twice and conceding once. Dordrecht provided the only different away-winning scoreline, defeating Jong PSV II 1-0. This repeating pattern created a strong concentration of narrow away victories, while Monza’s 4-0 home result supplied the largest margin.

The top-prize dividend of R33,600.00 was approximately 74.40 times the R451.60 payout in the 9/10 category. The number of perfect entries was also substantially smaller, with just 15 winners compared with 279 entries achieving nine correct outcomes. The published dividend difference illustrates the financial significance of completing the entire ten-match combination rather than finishing with one incorrect selection.

The combined reported net pools amounted to R630,002.80, consisting of R504,002.24 for 10/10 and R126,000.56 for 9/10. These figures are the published prize allocations and should not be interpreted as individual betting stakes or independently calculated payouts.

 

The Soccer 10 S10 V3 (SOO) pool produced five away victories, three home wins and two draws, with 22 goals scored across ten matches. AC Monza opened with an emphatic 4-0 victory over Cagliari, while Midtjylland and Kalmar secured consecutive 2-1 away wins. Trabzonspor defeated Besiktas 2-0 before Varbergs BoIS against Helsingborg and Beitar Jerusalem against Maccabi Tel Aviv both finished 0-0. Jong Ajax II recorded a 2-1 home victory, followed by away successes from Roda JC, Dordrecht and FC Steaua Bucuresti. The official 1/3/3/1/2/2/1/3/3/3 combination produced 15 perfect entries, each receiving R33,600.00 from the R504,002.24 net top-prize pool. The 9/10 category recorded 279 winners with a dividend of R451.60.

 

Soccer 10 Results and Analysis – Mon 19 Oct – S10 V1 (1PP)

The Soccer 10 S10 V1 (1PP) pool produced three home victories, four draws and three away wins, with 25 goals scored across ten fixtures. Torino and Montpellier recorded the largest winning margins through identical 3-0 away victories against Parma and Rodez AF. Tottenham Hotspur defeated Coventry City 3-1, while Waterford FC won a five-goal encounter against Galway United 3-2. Derry City secured a narrow 1-0 home success against St Patrick’s Athletic, and Gil Vicente defeated Sporting Braga 2-1 away. Four matches finished level, including 1-1 draws involving Celta de Vigo II, Getafe and Corinthians, while Goias and Nautico Capibaribe shared a goalless result. The official 2/3/1/3/1/2/3/1/2/2 combination produced only three perfect 10/10 entries, each receiving R177,833.80 from the R533,501.92 net top-prize pool. The 9/10 category recorded 109 winners, with a published dividend of R1,223.60.

Status: Official
Pool Code: S10 V1 (1PP)

 

Overall Match Results – Soccer 10 – Mon 19 Oct – S10 V1

 

⚽ Match Results Analysis – Soccer 10 – S10 V1

• Match 1: Celta de Vigo II 1-1 Tenerife. Celta de Vigo II and Tenerife opened the coupon with a 1-1 draw, immediately establishing the first successful 2 selection. Both teams scored once, but neither found the additional goal needed to win. The two-goal encounter introduced a result category that would appear four times across the ten fixtures. Celta became the first home team to finish level, while Tenerife secured the opening away draw. The scoreline was subsequently repeated by Getafe against Rayo Vallecano and Corinthians against Vitoria, making 1-1 the most frequent individual result on the coupon. This opening draw contributed two goals to the total of 25 and established a different pattern from the subsequent decisive victories by Montpellier and Derry City. Its importance was particularly clear in the official combination because entries needed to begin with a draw before alternating through several home and away outcomes. The result demonstrated that scoring once was not sufficient for either team to establish a winning margin.
• Match 2: Rodez AF 0-3 Montpellier. Montpellier recorded a commanding 3-0 away victory against Rodez AF, producing the first successful 3 selection. The visitors scored three times without conceding, while Rodez failed to register a goal at home. The three-goal margin was the joint-largest winning advantage of the pool, matched by Torino’s identical 3-0 success against Parma. Montpellier’s attacking return also matched Waterford FC’s and Tottenham Hotspur’s three-goal totals, although those home winners conceded twice and once respectively. This fixture contributed three goals to the overall total and provided the first clean-sheet victory. Montpellier’s result interrupted the opening draw and established an emphatic visiting success before Derry City returned the coupon to a home-winning selection. The scoreline was particularly decisive because Rodez did not score, leaving no requirement for Montpellier to protect a narrow margin against an opposition comeback on the final scoreboard.
• Match 3: Derry City 1-0 St Patrick’s Athletic. Derry City secured a narrow 1-0 home victory against St Patrick’s Athletic, producing the first successful 1 selection. The hosts scored the only goal and maintained a clean sheet, while the visitors failed to register a goal. This was the lowest-scoring decisive fixture of the round, contributing just one goal to the total of 25. Derry’s minimal attacking return was nevertheless sufficient because their opponents could not respond. The result contrasted with Montpellier’s preceding 3-0 away victory, which required three goals to establish a much larger margin. Both winning teams kept clean sheets, but Derry finished only one goal ahead. The successful home selection also continued the alternating pattern of draw, away win and home victory across the opening three positions. Derry’s defensive performance became one of the three outright clean-sheet victories, alongside Montpellier and Torino. Its importance was reinforced by the rarity of home winners, which accounted for only three of the ten outcomes.
• Match 4: Parma 0-3 Torino. Torino delivered an emphatic 3-0 away victory against Parma, exactly matching Montpellier’s result over Rodez AF. The visitors scored three times without conceding, establishing the joint-largest winning margin of the coupon. Parma failed to score at home, allowing Torino to complete another decisive clean-sheet success. The successful 3 became the second visiting victory after Montpellier’s earlier result. Both away teams recorded identical attacking totals and maintained complete defensive clean sheets, creating a clear pattern among the strongest visiting performances. The match contributed three goals to the overall total and interrupted Derry City’s home success. Torino’s three-goal advantage was larger than Gil Vicente’s subsequent narrow 2-1 victory against Braga, making it one of the most convincing individual results. With four matches completed, the coupon had produced two away wins, one home victory and one draw, without any consecutive repetition of result categories.
• Match 5: Waterford FC 3-2 Galway United. Waterford FC defeated Galway United 3-2 in the highest-scoring fixture of the pool. Five goals were shared between the teams, with Waterford scoring three times and Galway contributing two. Despite the relatively high total, the hosts finished only one goal ahead, making this a competitive final scoreline. The successful 1 became the second home victory of the coupon and interrupted Torino’s away success. Waterford’s three goals matched the attacking totals recorded by Montpellier and Torino, but their two goals conceded made the result considerably narrower. The match accounted for 20% of the pool’s 25 goals, making it the largest individual contributor to the scoring total. Galway became the highest-scoring losing team on the coupon, as no other defeated side managed more than one goal. Waterford’s result also demonstrated how the same three-goal attacking return could produce different winning margins depending on the opponent’s contribution.
• Match 6: Getafe 1-1 Rayo Vallecano. Getafe and Rayo Vallecano shared a 1-1 draw, producing the second successful 2 selection. Both sides scored once, repeating the opening result between Celta de Vigo II and Tenerife. Neither team established an outright winning advantage, and the fixture contributed two goals to the overall total. The draw interrupted Waterford’s 3-2 home victory and restored the level-result category after four consecutive decisive matches. Getafe became the second home side to finish level, while Rayo Vallecano joined Tenerife among visiting teams securing draws. The result also established that the first six fixtures contained two draws, two home wins and two away victories, an evenly balanced distribution. This balance would change only slightly during the final four matches because another home and away victory would follow before two consecutive draws completed the coupon.
• Match 7: Sporting Braga 1-2 Gil Vicente. Gil Vicente defeated Sporting Braga 2-1 away from home, becoming the third and final visiting winner. The visitors scored twice, while Braga managed one goal but could not secure a draw. Unlike Montpellier and Torino, who completed 3-0 clean-sheet victories, Gil Vicente conceded once and therefore required a second goal to establish the winning margin. The successful 3 interrupted Getafe’s draw and restored the visiting-winning category. The match contributed three goals to the total of 25 and was the only away victory in which both teams scored. Gil Vicente’s one-goal advantage was narrower than the three-goal margins recorded by the other visiting winners. The result also ensured that away victories would account for at least three of the ten positions, while the final matches would determine whether draws became the most frequent outcome category. Braga’s goal kept the final scoreline competitive, but it did not prevent the visitors from winning.
• Match 8: Tottenham Hotspur 3-1 Coventry City. Tottenham Hotspur recorded a convincing 3-1 home victory against Coventry City, supplying the third and final successful 1 selection. The hosts scored three times, while Coventry managed one goal but could not prevent a two-goal defeat. Four goals made this the second-highest-scoring fixture after Waterford’s 3-2 victory against Galway United. Tottenham’s three-goal attacking return matched those of Montpellier, Torino and Waterford, but the winning margin differed because Coventry scored once. The successful home selection interrupted Gil Vicente’s away victory and brought home wins level with visiting successes at three each. Tottenham’s result also marked the final outright victory of the coupon, with Goias and Corinthians subsequently drawing their matches. By the end of M8, the pool contained three home wins, three away victories and two draws, creating an evenly balanced distribution before the final pair of level results shifted the balance towards draws.
• Match 9: Goias 0-0 Nautico Capibaribe. Goias and Nautico Capibaribe finished 0-0, producing the third successful 2 selection. Neither team scored, making this the only goalless fixture of the round. Both sides completed the match with clean sheets, although neither secured an outright victory. The result interrupted Tottenham’s home success and contributed no goals to the pool’s total of 25. It also differed from the preceding draws, where both Celta de Vigo II and Getafe had finished 1-1 against their respective opponents. Goias became the third home team to draw, while Nautico supplied the third visiting draw. The successful level selection was particularly important because it began consecutive draws at M9 and M10, mirroring the distinctive middle section seen in the other Soccer 10 pool from the same date. With nine fixtures completed, draws had reached three, matching the number of home and away victories.
• Match 10: Corinthians 1-1 Vitoria. Corinthians and Vitoria completed the coupon with a 1-1 draw, providing the fourth successful 2 selection. Both teams scored once, repeating the results between Celta de Vigo II and Tenerife and between Getafe and Rayo Vallecano. Neither Corinthians nor Vitoria established a winning advantage, leaving the final fixture level. The result contributed two goals to the pool’s total, raising the completed figure to 25. It also extended the closing sequence to two consecutive draws, making level outcomes the most frequent result category in the coupon. The successful 2 completed the official 2/3/1/3/1/2/3/1/2/2 combination, confirming four draws, three home victories and three away wins. Corinthians and Vitoria therefore provided the final outcome required for the three perfect entries that shared the top-prize pool. The closing draw reinforced the importance of correctly identifying level matches throughout this difficult ten-fixture combination.

 

Soccer 10 Results Summary

• Home Wins: 3
• Draws: 4
• Away Wins: 3
• Total Goals: 25
• Goals Scored by Home Teams: 11
• Goals Scored by Away Teams: 14
• Biggest Winning Margins: Rodez AF 0-3 Montpellier / Parma 0-3 Torino (3 goals each)
• Highest-Scoring Match: Waterford FC 3-2 Galway United (5 goals)
• Second-Highest-Scoring Match: Tottenham Hotspur 3-1 Coventry City (4 goals)
• Lowest-Scoring Match: Goias 0-0 Nautico Capibaribe
• Lowest-Scoring Decisive Match: Derry City 1-0 St Patrick’s Athletic
• Clean-Sheet Victories: Montpellier, Derry City and Torino
• Home Victories: Derry City, Waterford FC and Tottenham Hotspur
• Away Victories: Montpellier, Torino and Gil Vicente
• Drawn Matches: Celta de Vigo II 1-1 Tenerife / Getafe 1-1 Rayo Vallecano / Goias 0-0 Nautico Capibaribe / Corinthians 1-1 Vitoria
• Most Frequent Scoreline: 1-1 (3 matches)
• Consecutive Draws: M9 and M10
• Winning Combination: 2/3/1/3/1/2/3/1/2/2
• Status: Official

 

Official Winning Combination – Soccer 10

2/3/1/3/1/2/3/1/2/2

The completed combination contained four draws, three home victories and three away wins. Drawn results accounted for 40% of the coupon, while home and visiting successes each represented 30%. The two consecutive draws at M9 and M10 completed a sequence in which level results were more frequent than either category of outright victory.

 

Soccer 10 Prize Results

9/10 Results

Net Pool: R133,375.48
Winners: 109
Dividend: R1,223.60

 

10/10 Results

Net Pool: R533,501.92
Winners: 3
Dividend: R177,833.80

 

Soccer 10 Dividend Analysis

The official Soccer 10 S10 V1 (1PP) payout recorded only three perfect 10/10 entries, each receiving R177,833.80 from the R533,501.92 net top-prize pool. The 9/10 category recorded 109 winning entries, with a net pool of R133,375.48 and a published dividend of R1,223.60. The successful combination contained four draws, three home victories and three away wins, making drawn outcomes the most frequent result category.

The distribution of the four drawn matches was particularly important. Celta de Vigo II against Tenerife finished 1-1 in the opening position, while Getafe and Rayo Vallecano produced another 1-1 result at M6. The final two fixtures also ended level, with Goias and Nautico Capibaribe finishing 0-0 before Corinthians and Vitoria shared a 1-1 draw. Successful entries therefore needed to identify a draw at the beginning, another in the middle and two consecutive draws at the end.

The six decisive results were evenly divided between home and away winners. Montpellier and Torino recorded identical 3-0 away victories, while Gil Vicente won 2-1 at Sporting Braga. Derry City secured a 1-0 home victory, Waterford FC defeated Galway United 3-2, and Tottenham Hotspur overcame Coventry City 3-1. The three home wins and three away successes therefore created a balanced set of outright results, while draws supplied the additional category that dominated the overall combination.

The ten fixtures produced 25 goals, averaging 2.5 per match. Waterford against Galway contributed five goals, making it the highest-scoring contest. Tottenham against Coventry added four, while the two 3-0 away victories provided six goals between them. Together, these four matches accounted for fifteen goals, representing 60% of the total. The four drawn matches contributed six goals, and the remaining decisive fixtures added four.

The top-prize dividend of R177,833.80 was approximately 145.34 times the R1,223.60 payout in the 9/10 category. Only three entries achieved all ten correct results, compared with 109 entries in the lower category. This substantial difference illustrates the rarity of perfect entries in the published results and the financial effect of distributing the top-prize pool among a very small number of winners.

The combined reported net pools amounted to R666,877.40, consisting of R533,501.92 for the 10/10 category and R133,375.48 for 9/10. These official figures reflect the published prize allocations and dividends, not estimated pre-match returns or individual betting stakes.

The final combination was demanding because it did not follow a simple home- or away-winning trend. The opening eight positions alternated among draws and outright winners, while the last two positions both required draw selections. The four level outcomes and the two commanding away victories helped create a distinctive result distribution. Although the official data do not disclose individual betting choices, the small number of perfect entries confirms that relatively few winning tickets matched the full ten-result sequence.

 

The Soccer 10 S10 V1 (1PP) pool produced four draws, three home victories and three away wins, with 25 goals scored across ten fixtures. Celta de Vigo II and Tenerife opened with a 1-1 draw before Montpellier defeated Rodez AF 3-0. Derry City secured a 1-0 home victory, and Torino won 3-0 at Parma. Waterford FC delivered the highest-scoring result by defeating Galway United 3-2, while Getafe and Rayo Vallecano shared a 1-1 draw. Gil Vicente won 2-1 at Sporting Braga, and Tottenham Hotspur beat Coventry City 3-1. Goias against Nautico Capibaribe ended 0-0 before Corinthians and Vitoria completed the coupon with a 1-1 draw. The official 2/3/1/3/1/2/3/1/2/2 combination produced only three perfect 10/10 entries, each receiving R177,833.80 from the R533,501.92 net top-prize pool. The 9/10 category recorded 109 winners with a dividend of R1,223.60.

 

Betting Types Explained

The 1X2 System – Classic Match Result

This is the standard bet used in soccer betting and all Soccer Pools. You choose the outcome after 90 minutes:

• 1 – Home team to win
• X – Draw
• 2 – Away team to win

Singles, Doubles & Triple Bets

Sometimes it’s safer to back more than one possible result in a single match.

Triple Chance Bets are only available in Soccer Pools-style games and lock that leg of your bet.

Double Chance Bets are widely used in normal sports betting and combo tickets.

Double Chance Betting

• 1X – Home win or Draw
• X2 – Draw or Away win
• 12 – Home win or Away win (no draw)

Triple Chance Betting

1X2 – Any result will land (home/draw/away)

Banker Bets & Codes

Bankers are selections with the strongest stats – picks with the highest chance of success.

Over / Under Goals – O/U Explained

Over Goals (O/):

• Over 0.5 – 1+ goal total
• Over 1.5 – 2 or more goals
• Over 2.5 – 3 or more goals
• Over 3.5 – 4 or more goals
• Over 4.5 – 5 or more goals

Under Goals (U/):

• Under 0.5 – goalless match (0-0)
• Under 1.5 – max 1 goal total
• Under 2.5 – max 2 goals
• Under 3.5 – max 3 goals
• Under 4.5 – max 4 goals

Both Teams To Score (BTTS)

• BTTS – Yes: both teams must score
• BTTS – No: one or both teams fail to score